Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a viral vector vaccine against influenza A: Phase I open clinical trial
https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2025-25-1-7-21
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The development of universal influenza vaccines based on conserved influenza virus antigens is a promising strategy for preventing pandemic influenza. Recombinant vaccines based on adenoviral vectors have high antiviral potential and have proven their effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this regard, the development and clinical evaluation of a viral vector vaccine against influenza A seem relevant.
AIM. The aim was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a broad-spectrum viral vector vaccine against influenza A after a single intranasal administration in healthy volunteers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. This clinical trial studied the GamFluVac recombinant human adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5)-based vaccine against influenza A (National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after the honorary academician N.F. Gamaleya). The clinical trial enrolled 36 volunteers. The follow-up period was 28 days. The safety assessment of the viral vector vaccine was based on the incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs) after a single intranasal administration at doses of 2.5×1010 (Group 1), 1.0×1011 (Group 2), and 2.5×1011 (Group 3) viral particles. Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring serum IgG antibodies against influenza A (H5N2) by enzyme immunoassay on Day 0 and Day 28.
RESULTS. No serious or severe AEs were reported during the clinical trial. Most AEs associated with the vaccine manifested as respiratory disorders, abnormal blood findings, and general disorders (elevated body temperature, headache, chills, malaise, arthralgia, and myalgia). Statistically significant differences (p=0.0285) were identified in the incidence of general disorders and administration site conditions in Group 1 (0%), Group 2 (16.7%), and Group 3 (33.3%). Group 3 demonstrated the highest increase in the geometric mean titres of specific IgG antibodies (2.8 times the baseline) on Day 28. In this group, 100% of volunteers had a ≥2-fold seroconversion rate, and 41.7% of volunteers had a ≥4-fold seroconversion rate.
CONCLUSIONS. This phase I clinical trial of the GamFluVac viral vector vaccine against influenza A demonstrated the immunogenicity and favourable safety profile of the vaccine after a single intranasal administration.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. M. ShmarovRussian Federation
Maxim M. Shmarov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
S. V. Alekseeva
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Alekseeva, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
N. A. Dovzhenko
Russian Federation
Nina A. Dovzhenko, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
A. S. Bandelyuk
Russian Federation
Alina S. Bandelyuk
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
I. B. Esmagambetov
Russian Federation
Ilias B. Esmagambetov, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
D. N. Shcherbinin
Russian Federation
Dmitrii N. Shcherbinin, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
L. V. Verkhovskaya
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Verkhovskaya, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
S. V. Volchihina
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Volchihina
4 Novaya St., Sergiev Posad-6, Moscow Region 141306
Ya. V. Simakova
Russian Federation
Yana V. Simakova
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
V. F. Babira
Russian Federation
Vladimir F. Babira
4 Novaya St., Sergiev Posad-6, Moscow Region 141306
D. Y. Logunov
Russian Federation
Denis Y. Logunov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Acad. RAS
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
A. L. Gintsburg
Russian Federation
Alexander L. Gintsburg, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Prof., Acad. RAS
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
References
1. Taubenberger JK, Kash JC. Influenza virus evolution, host adaptation, and pandemic formation. CellHost Microbe. 2010; 7(6):440–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.05.009
2. Belov AB, Kulikov PV. Solved and problematic issues of influenza epidemiology one hundred years after Spanish flu pandemic. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2019;18(5):109–20 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2019-18-5-109-120
3. Chen R, Holmes EC. Avian influenza virus exhibits rapid evolutionary dynamics. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(12):2336–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl102
4. Thompson AJ, Paulson JC. Adaptation of influenza viruses to human airway receptors. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100017. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.rev120.013309
5. Krammer F, Smith GJD, Fouchier RAM, Peiris M, Kedzierska K, Doherty PC, et al. Influenza. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0002-y
6. Koutsakos M, Kedzierska K, Subbarao K. Immune responses to avian influenza viruses. J Immunol. 2019;202(2):382–91. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1801070
7. Halder N, Kelso JK, Milne GJ. A model-based economic analysis of pre-pandemic influenza vaccination cost-effectiveness. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:266. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-266
8. Ostrowsky J, Arpey M, Moore K, Osterholm M, Friede M, Gordon J. Tracking progress in universal influenza vaccine development. Curr Opin Virol. 2020;40:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.02.003
9. Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV, Shcheblyakov DV, Tukhvatulin AI, Zubkova OV, Dzharullaeva AS, et al. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: An interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia. Lancet. 2021;397(10275):671–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00234-8
10. Zhang C, Zhou D. Adenoviral vector-based strategies against infectious disease and cancer. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(8):2064–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1165908
11. Lenaerts L, De Clercq E, Naesens L. Clinical features and treatment of adenovirus infections. Rev Med Virol. 2008;18(6):357–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.589
12. Kryukova NO, Rakunova EB, Kostinov MP, Baranova IA, Svitich OA. Secretory immunoglobulin A of the respiratory system and COVID-19. Pulmonologiya. 2021;31(6):792–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2021-31-6-792-798
13. Zainutdinov SS, Sivolobova GF, Loktev VB, Kochneva GV. Mucosal immunity and vaccines against viral infections. Problems of Virology. 2021;66(6):399–408 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36233/0507-4088-82
14. Alu A, Chen L, Lei H, Wei Y, Tian X, Wei X. Intranasal COVID-19 vaccines: From bench to bed. EBioMedicine. 2022;76:103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103841
15. Sedova ES, Verkhovskaya LV, Artemova EA, Shcherbinin DN, Lysenko AA, Rudneva IA, et al. Protecting mice from H7 Avian influenza virus by immunisation with a recombinant adenovirus encoding influenza A virus conserved antigens. BIOpreparations. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2020;20(1):60–7 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2020-20-1-60-67
16. Tutykhina I, Esmagambetov I, Bagaev A, Pichugin A, Lysenko A, Shcherbinin D, et al. Vaccination potential of B and T epitope-enriched NP and M2 against influenza A viruses from different clades and hosts. PLoS One. 2018;13(1): e0191574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191574
17. Smirnov YA, Lipatov AS, Van Beek R, Gitelman AK, Osterhaus AD, Claas EC. Characterization of adaptation of an avian influenza A (H5N2) virus to a mammalian host. Acta Virol. 2000;44(1):1–8. PMID: 10989685
18. Cherenova LV, Kashtigo TV, Saiadian KhS, Shmarov MM. Development of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors: A review of foreign clinical studies (part 1). Medical Immunology (Russia). 2017;19(2):111–26 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-2017-2-111-126
19. Cherenova LV, Kashtigo TV, Saiadian KhS, Shmarov MM. Development of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors: A review of foreign clinical studies (part 2). Medical Immunology (Russia). 2017;19(4):329–58 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-2017-4-329-358
20. Dolzhikova IV, Zubkova OV, Tukhvatulin AI, Dzharullaeva AS, Tukhvatulina NM, Shcheblyakov DV, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of GamEvac-Combi, a heterologous VSV- and Ad5-vectored Ebola vaccine: An open phase I/II trial in healthy adults in Russia. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(3):613–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1238535
21. Tasker S, O’Rourke AW, Suyundikov A, Booth P-GJ, Bart St, Krishnan V, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a novel intranasal influenza vaccine (NasoVAX): A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial. Vaccines. 2021;9(3):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030224
22. Zuev EV, Evdokimova OL, Markova OA, Korotkevich IA, Grigorieva TV, Khamitov RA. Comparative safety evaluation of intranasal and intramuscular immunisation with Ad26 and Ad5-vectored vaccines to prevent coronavirus infection. Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2023;23(3):275–89 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2023-23-431
23. Krammer F, Weir JP, Engelhardt O, Katz JM, Cox RJ. Meeting report and review: Immunological assays and correlates of protection for next-generation influenza vaccines. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020;14(2):237–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12706
24. Pavlova S, D’Alessio F, Houard S, Remarque EJ, Stockhofe N, Engelhardt OG. Workshop report: Immunoassay standardisation for “universal” influenza vaccines. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017;11(3):194–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12445
25. Matsuda K, Migueles SA, Huang J, Bolkhovitinov L, Stuccio S, Griesman T, et al. A replication-competent adenovirusvectored influenza vaccine induces durable systemic and mucosal immunity. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(5):e140794. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci140794
26. Hayward AC, Fragaszy EB, Bermingham A, Wang L, Copas A, Edmunds WJ, et al. Comparative community burden and severity of seasonal and pandemic influenza: Results of the Flu Watch cohort study Hayward. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(6):445–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70034-7
Supplementary files
![]() |
1. Fig. S1. Influenza A/H5N2-specific IgG titres measured by enzyme immunoassay in serum samples of volunteers after a single intranasal administration of the viral vector vaccine against influenza A on Day 0 (before vaccination, on the day of administration) and Day 28. A, Group 1 (n=12), 2.5×1010 virus particles (v.p.); B, Group 2 (n=12), 1.0×1011 v.p.; C, Group 3 (n=12), 2.5×1011 v.p. The X-axis shows observation days, and the Y-axis shows reciprocal titres of influenza A/H5N2-specific IgG antibodies. Designations: individual titres of influenza A/H5N2-specific IgG antibodies (dots), geometric mean titres (GMTs) of antibodies in the group, and 95% confidence interval. Significance levels for differences between antibody GMTs on Day 28 (after vaccination) and Day 0 (baseline) in the group: ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001; ns, not significant. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(724KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
![]() |
2. Table S1. Mean age and other demographic and anthropometric data of volunteers who took part in the clinical trial of the viral vector influenza A vaccine | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(421KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Shmarov M.M., Alekseeva S.V., Dovzhenko N.A., Bandelyuk A.S., Esmagambetov I.B., Shcherbinin D.N., Verkhovskaya L.V., Volchihina S.V., Simakova Ya.V., Babira V.F., Logunov D.Y., Gintsburg A.L. Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a viral vector vaccine against influenza A: Phase I open clinical trial. Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2025;25(1):7-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2025-25-1-7-21