Quantitative mass spectrometry with ¹⁸O labelling as an alternative approach for determining protease activity: an example of trypsin

SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE. In the quality control of proteolytic enzyme components of medicinal products, the activity of proteases is determined by spectrophotometry, which involves mea­suring the amidase or esterase activity using a synthetic substrate and the proteolytic activity using the Anson method. These methods require special substrates and have low sensitivity; their specificity may be insufficient, which may lead to serious errors. Quantitative mass spectrometry is an alternative approach to protease activity assays, which involves adding an isotope-labelled peptide to hydrolysates of the test enzyme. This approach allows determining the activity of proteases, notably, by the hydrolysis of specific peptide bonds, while simulta­neously confirming the identity and specificity of the test sample. Quantitative mass spectrometry has high sensitivity and does not require special substrates.

AIM. This study aimed to investigate the possibility of enzymatic activity assay and enzyme identification by quantitative mass spectrometry with ¹⁸O labelling through an example of trypsin with casein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study used trypsin, casein, and H₂¹⁸O (Izotop, Russia). Peptide separation was performed using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system; mass spectra were obtained using a Bruker Ultraflex II MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer. Quantitative mass spectrometry was performed using a standard peptide, which was obtained from casein by tryptic digestion and HPLC purification. For ¹⁸O labelling, the authors dried the peptide and incubated it in H₂¹⁸О water. The quantitative analysis of the product was carried out using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The authors used quantitative mass spectrometry with ¹⁸O labelling to determine enzymatic activity and calculate the Michaelis constant (K_M).

RESULTS. Following the tryptic digestion of casein, the authors identified the fragments corre­sponding to casein chains. The authors produced the isotope-labelled standard peptide and calculated its concentration using mass spectrometry. The authors determined the rate of casein digestion by trypsin and calculated the K_M for trypsin, which was 13.65±0.60 μM. The standard deviation for repeated measurements showed that the mass-spectrometric method had a lower error of measurement than the spectrophotometric method. The sensitivity threshold for the mass-spectrometric method was 0.50±0.08 μM.

CONCLUSIONS. The results obtained with trypsin confirm the possibility of enzymatic activity determination by the proposed method of quantitative mass spectrometry with ¹⁸O labelling. According to the sensitivity evaluation results, this method can be used for the simultaneous determination of enzyme activity, identity, and specificity. The proposed mass spectrometry approach is universal, it does not require expensive materials and reagents, and it can be easily adapted to determine the activity of virtually any protease.

1. Lukasheva EV, Babayeva G, Karshieva SS, Zhdanov DD, Pokrovsky VS. L-lysine α-oxidase: enzyme with anticancer properties. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(11):1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14111070

2. Pokrovskaya MV, Pokrovsky VS, Aleksandrova SS, Sokolov NN, Zhdanov DD. Molecular analysis of L-asparaginases for clarification of the mechanism of action and optimization of pharmacological functions. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(3):599. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030599

3. Liska AJ, Shevchenko A. Combining mass spectrometry with database interrogation strategies in proteomics. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2003;22(5):291–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(03)00507-7

4. Goloshchapova EO, Rounova OB, Minero AS, Fadeikina OV, Volkova RA, Degterev MB, et al. Development and certification of a pharmacopoeial reference standard for primary structure identification of purified recombinant interferon beta-1b by peptide mapping. Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2022;22(1):23–37 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2022-22-1-23-37

5. Zhang Y, Ling Z, Du G, Chen J, Kang Z. Improved production of active Streptomyces griseus trypsin with a novel auto-catalyzed strategy. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):23158. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23158

6. Huang CT. Vertebrate serum inhibitors of Aedes aegypti trypsin. Insect Biochem. 1971;1(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1790(71)90019-9

7. Toropygin IYu, Kugaevskaya EV, Mirgorodskaya OA, Elisseeva YuE, Kozmin YuP, Popov IA, et al. The N-domain of angiotensin-converting enzyme specifically hydrolyzes the Arg-5-His-6 bond of Alzheimer’s Aβ-(1-16) peptide and its isoAsp-7 analogue with different efficiency as evidenced by quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008;22(2):231–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3357

8. Li M, Rauf A, Guo Y, Kang X. Real-time label-free kinetics monitoring of trypsin-catalyzed ester hydrolysis by a nanopore sensor. ACS Sens. 2019;4(11):2854–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b01783

9. Treetharnmathurot B, Ovartlarnporn C, Wungsintaweekul J, Duncan R, Wiwattanapatapee R. Effect of PEG molecular weight and linking chemistry on the biological activity and thermal stability of PEGylated trypsin. Int J Pharm. 2008;357(1–2):252–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.01.016

10. Senphan T, Benjakul S, Kishimura H. Purification and characterization of trypsin from hepatopancreas of Pacific white shrimp. J Food Biochem. 2015;39(4):388–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12147

11. Homola J, Yee S, Gauglitz G. Surface plasmon resonance sensors: review. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 1999;54(1):3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(98)00321-9

12. Shumyantseva VV, Kuzikov AV, Masamrekh RA, Bulko TV, Archakov AI. From electrochemistry to enzyme kinetics of cytochrome P450. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;121:192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.08.040

13. Filippova TA, Masamrekh RA, Shumyantseva VV, Latsis IA, Farafonova TE, Ilina IY, et al. Electrochemical biosensor for trypsin activity assay based on cleavage of immobilized tyrosine-containing peptide. Talanta. 2023;257:124341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124341

14. Rappsilber J, Ryder U, Lamond AI, Mann M. Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Genome Res. 2002;12(8):1231–45. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.473902

15. Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T, Rappsilber J, et al. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4(9):1265–72. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M500061-MCP200

16. Chen X, Wei S, Ji Y, Guo X, Yang F. Quantitative proteomics using SILAC: principles, applications, and developments. Proteomics. 2015;15(18):3175–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500108

17. Vogl DP, Conibear AC, Becker CFW. Segmental and site-specific isotope labelling strategies for structural analysis of posttranslationally modified proteins. RSC Chem Biol. 2021;2(5):1441–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CB00045D

18. Chahrour O, Cobice D, Malone J. Stable isotope labelling methods in mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015;113:2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.04.013

19. Petriz BA, Franco OL. Application of cutting-edge proteomics technologies for elucidating host-bacteria interactions. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2014;95:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800453-1.00001-4

20. Kozmin YP, Manoilov AV, Serebryakova MV, Mirgorodskaya OA. A direct introduction of ¹⁸О isotopes into peptides and proteins for quantitative mass spectroscopy analysis. Russ J Bioorganic Chem. 2011;37(6):719–31. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162011060094

21. Swaney DL, Wenger CD, Coon JJ. Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(3):1323–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr900863u

22. Mach H, Middaugh CR, Lewis RV. Statistical determination of the average values of the extinction coefficients of tryptophan and tyrosine in native proteins. Anal Biochem. 1992;200(1):74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(92)90279-G

23. Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J, Demirev PA, Fenselau C. Proteolytic ¹⁸О labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal Chem. 2004;76(9):2675. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac049600x

24. Finehout EJ, Cantor JR, Lee KH. Kinetic characterization of sequencing grade modified trypsin. Proteomics. 2005;5(9):2319–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401268