The use of quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of S-antigen concentration in whole-virion inactivated adsorbed coronavirus vaccines
https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2022-22-4-405-413
Abstract
The severe consequences and high mortality of COVID-19 prompted the development of a wide range of preventive vaccines. The first vaccines to be tested were developed in China and formulated as inactivated SARS-CoV-2 adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide. One of the quality indicators for inactivated adsorbed vaccines is the degree of adsorption, which can be used to control the content not only of non-adsorbed antigen, but also of specific antigen in one dose of a vaccine.
The aim of the study was to investigate the possibility of desorbing SARS-CoV-2 antigen from formulated adsorbed vaccines and the possibility of measuring its concentration using the BioScan-SARS-CoV-2 (S) ELISA kit for SARS-CoV-2 S-protein content determination.
Materials and methods: the study used four batches of BBIBP-CorV by CNBG, Sinopharm (China) and three batches of CoronaVac by Sinovac Biotech (China). The authors desorbed SARS-CoV-2 S antigen in accordance with monograph FS.3.3.1.0029.15 of the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation (Ph. Rus.), edition XIV, and quantified it using the BioScan-SARS-CoV-2 (S) ELISA kit by Bioservice Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Russia).
Results: mean S-antigen concentrations in the desorbed samples ranged from 61 to 129 ng/mL for BBIBP-CorV and from 461 to 533 ng/mL for CoronaVac.
Conclusions: the study demonstrated the possibility of specific SARS-CoV-2 antigen desorption from the surface of aluminium hydroxide using the Ph. Rus. method, as well as the possibility of S-antigen quantification in desorbed medicinal products and supernatants using the BioScan-SARS-CoV-2 (S) ELISA kit. The authors observed 3.6- to 8.7-fold difference between the S-antigen concentrations of the desorbed preparations by the two manufacturers.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. S. OksanichRussian Federation
Aleksey S. Oksanich, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
5A Maly Kazenny Ln., Moscow 105064
A. G. Krasko
Belarus
Anatoly G. Krasko, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
23 Filimonov St., Minsk 220114
T. G. Samartseva
Russian Federation
Tatiana G. Samartseva.
5A Maly Kazenny Ln., Moscow 105064
E. L. Gasich
Belarus
Elena L. Gasich, Dr. Sci. (Biol.)
23 Filimonov St., Minsk 220114
G. M. Ignatyev
Russian Federation
Georgy M. Ignatyev, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
5A Maly Kazenny Ln., Moscow 105064
References
1. Zhang Y, Zeng G, Pan H, Li C, Hu Y, Chu K, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, -placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(2):181–92.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4
2. Wang H, Zhang Y, Huang B, Deng W, Quan Y, Wang W, et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate, BBIBP-CorV, with potent protection against SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2020;182(3):713–21.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.008
3. Han B, Song Y, Li C, Yang W, Ma Q, Jiang Z, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy children and adolescents: a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(12):1645–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00319-4
4. Xia S, Duan K, Zhang Y, Zhao D, Zhang H, Xie Z, et al. Effect of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 on safety and immunogenicity outcomes: Interim Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2020;324(10):951–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.15543
5. Doroftei B, Ciobica A, Ilie OD, Maftei R, Ilea C. Mini-review discussing the reliability and efficiency of COVID-19 Vaccines. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(4):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040579
6. Sharma R, Tiwari S, Dixit A. Covaxin: an overview of its immunogenicity and safety trials in India. Bioinformation. 2021;17(10):840–5. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630017840
7. Ella R, Vadrevu KM, Jogdand H, Prasad S, Reddy S, Sarangi V, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: a double-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(5):637–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30942-7
8. Kozlovskaya LI, Piniaeva AN, Ignatyev GM, Gordeychuk IV, Volok VP, Rogova YV, et al. Long-term humoral immunogenicity, safety and protective efficacy of inactivated vaccine against COVID-19 (CoviVac) in preclinical studies. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10(1):1790–806.https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.1971569
9. Bar-On YM, Flamholz A, Phillips R, Milo R. Science Forum: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) by the numbers. Elife. 2020;9:e57309. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57309
10. Benjamanukul S, Traiyan S, Yorsaeng R, Vichaiwattana P, Sudhinaraset N, Wanlapakorn N, Poovorawan Y. Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in health care workers. J Med Virol. 2022;94(4):1442–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27458
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Oksanich A.S., Krasko A.G., Samartseva T.G., Gasich E.L., Ignatyev G.M. The use of quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of S-antigen concentration in whole-virion inactivated adsorbed coronavirus vaccines. Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2022;22(4):405-413. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2022-22-4-405-413