Evaluation of the applicability of immunochromatography to the identification of live plague vaccines and the tularaemia allergen (Tularin)

The regulatory standards require that the identification of live plague vaccines and the liquid tularaemia allergen (Tularin) should be performed by immunofluorescence. A major drawback of the recommended method is its labour intensive nature. However, immunochromatography represents an alternative method that offers a number of advantages, including rapid testing and easy result interpretation.

 The aim of the study was to assess the applicability of immunochromatography to the identification of live plague vaccines and the liquid tularaemia allergen (Tularin).

Materials and methods. The authors performed identification tests using samples of the pharmacopoeia standard for live plague vaccines, three commercial batches of a live plague vaccine, and two batches of the liquid tularaemia allergen (Tularin). These samples were tested using immunochromatographic assay (ICA) reagent kits for rapid detection and identification of Yersinia pestis (ICA System for Y. pestis) and Francisella tularensis (ICA System for F. tularensis) manufactured by the State Scientific Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Results. The findings show that immunochromatography is an effective, rapid, and species-specific method to confirm the presence of Y. pestis in a sample of a live plague vaccine or F. tularensis in a sample of the liquid tularaemia allergen (Tularin). To perform identification tests by immunochromatography, the authors recommend diluting live plague vaccine samples to a concentration of 10⁹ bacterial cells/mL and using undiluted samples of the liquid tularaemia allergen (Tularin).

Conclusions. The study results may support the inclusion of ICA into the regulatory standards for live plague vaccines and the liquid tularaemia allergen (Tularin) as an alternative identification method.

1. Onishchenko GG, Kutyrev VV, eds. Laboratory diagnosis of dangerous infectious diseases. Practical guide. Moscow: Shiko; 2013 (In Russ.). EDN: SHFBUN

2. Andryukov BG, Lyapun IN, Bynina MP, Matosova EV. Simplified formats of modern biosensors: 60 years of use immunochromatographic test systems in laboratory diagnostics. Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2020;65(10):611–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/0869-2084-2020-65-10-611-618

3. Soloviev PV, Baranova EV, Fedyukina GN. Development and experimental production of immunochromatographic test systems for the detection and identification of B. anthracis, Y. pestis, F. tularensis and L. monocytogenes. In: Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference of young scientists and specialists of research institutions of Rospotrebnadzor “Biological safety in the modern world”. April 21–22, 2009. Obolensk, Protvino; 2009. P. 140–2 (In Russ.). EDN: UATJPV

4. Belkova SA, Balakhonov SV, Biketov SF, Baranova EV. Practical evaluation of an immunochromatographic test system for rapid indication of the plague agent. Journal of Infectious Pathology. 2009;16(3):69–70 (In Russ.). EDN: SJLWMR

5. Chanteau S, Rahalison L, Ralafiarisoa L, Foulon J, Ratsitorahina M, Ratsifasoamanana L, et al. Development and testing of a rapid diagnostic test for bubonic and pneumonic plague. Lancet. 2003;361(9353):211–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12270-2

6. Belkova SA, Balakhonov SV. Indication of Yersinia pestis capsular antigen in suspensions of small mammal organs using immunochromatographic test system. Far Eastern Journal of Infectious Pathology. 2014;(25):96–8 (In Russ.). EDN: TAVIAL

7. Gubareva TI, Ulanova GI. Analysis of the effectiveness of laboratory methods for especially dangerous infections. In: The most important issues of infectious and parasitic diseases. Sixth collection of scientific works. Izhevsk; 2018. P. 26–8 (In Russ.). EDN: YYQXRR

8. Kholin AV, Sharakshanov MB, Verzhutsky DB, Korzun VM, Orgilbayar L, Gankhuyag T, et al. Results of epizootiological survey along the border areas of Kharkhira-Turgensky natural plague focus between Russia and Mongolia in 2019. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2020;(2):129–34 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2020-2-129-134

9. Eremkin AV, Elagin GD, Pechenkin DV, Fomenkov OO, Bogatcheva NV, Kitmanov AA, et al. The development of immune enzyme and immune chromatographic monoclonal test-systems for detecting tularemia agent. Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2016;61(3):184–7 (In Russ.). EDN: VXLOFZ

10. Kretenchuk O.F. Domestically-produced monoclonal-antibody-based means of diagnosing particularly dangerous infections. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2021;(4):35–45 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2021-4-35-45

11. Zaitsev AA, Gnusareva OA, Solodovnikov BV, Tsareva NS, Ostapovich VV, Kulichenko AN. Algorithm of laboratory diagnostics applied for examination of ixodic ticks for tularaemia. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2012;(3):79–81 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2012-3-79-81

12. Zaitsev AA, Gnusareva OA, Tsareva NS, Ostapovich VV, Borzdova IYu, Kulichenko AN. Immuno-chromatographic test system application for rapid detection of Francisella tularensis lipopolysaccharide in monitoring of natural foci. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2013;(1):78–80 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2013-1-78-80

13. Kasina IV, Alekseeva SA, Berdnikova ZE, Nemirovskaya TI, Alekhina AS. Prospects for improving evaluation of live tularaemia vaccine quality. BIOpreparations. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2017;17(4):240–7 (In Russ.). EDN: ZXGLLX

14. Kasina IV, Alekseeva SA, Nemirovskaya TI. Theoretical and experimental substantiation of alternative methods for quality control of live anthrax vaccine. BIOpreparations. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2020;20(4):277–84 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2020-20-4-277-284

15. Pozdeev OK. Medical microbiology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010. (In Russ.). EDN: QLFKVB