A modified single-domain antibody candidate for the treatment of botulism caused by botulinum toxin type A
https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2025-591
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Currently, the primary treatment method for botulism is the use of botulinum antitoxin, which causes a number of side effects, including allergic reactions. The development of medicinal products based on monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in particular, single-domain mAbs fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment, holds promise for the treatment of botulinum toxin poisoning.
AIM. This study aimed to optimise the technology for laboratory-scale production of a single-domain mAb fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment (B11-Fc) for botulism treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis and to conduct a preclinical efficacy study of this mAb.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study used CHO cells. B7, a stable clone producing the B11-Fc single-domain mAb, was cultured in Erlenmeyer flasks using commercially available media and feeds. The B11-Fc mAb was purified using multistep chromatography (including affinity, anion exchange, and multimodal chromatography steps), virus elimination, and tangential flow filtration. The purity of the B11-Fc mAb was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrophoresis. The glycan profile was established by HPLC. Bio-layer interferometry was used to measure the mAb concentration in the culture fluid and to determine the equilibrium dissociation constants for the mAb and various Fc receptors. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) was produced by culturing the Clostridium botulinum A98 strain and purified by chromatography. In vivo experiments involved intraperitoneal and intragastric administration of BoNT/A to female BALB/c mice, with a subsequent assessment of the severity of toxic signs. The B11-Fc mAb was administered intramuscularly or intravenously (to study the pharmacokinetics). The efficacy of the B11-Fc mAb (in terms of mouse survival) was studied using various toxicity models and the prophylactic and therapeutic modes of administration.
RESULTS. The study optimised culture conditions for the B11-Fc mAb producer clone and developed a mAb purification technology that ensured a high yield (0.5 g/L) and a purity of over 99%. The average particle size in the mAb preparation was 7.85 nm. The study characterised the glycan profile of the B11-Fc mAb and determined the equilibrium dissociation constants for the mAb and human Fc receptors. Poisoning with BoNT/A was modelled in mice. The intramuscular administration of the B11-Fc mAb at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg provided 100% protection from poisoning with BoNT/A that was simultaneously administered at a dose of 20 LD50. The study determined the main pharmacokinetic parameters of the B11-Fc mAb. The experiments demonstrated that prophylactic administration of the B11-Fc mAb for 21 days had a protective effect against BoNT/A administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 5 LD50, and therapeutic administration of the mAb 14 h after intragastric administration of the toxin at a dose of 12,000 intraperitoneal LD50 provided 100% protection.
CONCLUSIONS. The authors optimised the technology for laboratory-scale production of the candidate modified single-domain mAb. In vivo experiments conducted using BoNT/A toxicity models demonstrated that the B11-Fc mAb is highly effective in botulism prevention and treatment. On the basis of preclinical data, phase I clinical trials have been initiated to study B11-Fc in healthy volunteers.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. DerkaevRussian Federation
Artem A. Derkaev
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
E. I. Ryabova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina I. Ryabova
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098;
23 Academician Skryabin St., Moscow 109472
I. B. Esmagambetov
Russian Federation
Ilias B. Esmagambetov, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
D. V. Shcheblyakov
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Shcheblyakov, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
A. N. Noskov
Anatoly N. Noskov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
I. D. Vinogradova
Russian Federation
Irina D. Vinogradova, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
V. V. Prokofiev
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Prokofiev
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
D. S. Polyansky
Russian Federation
Dmitry S. Polyansky
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
D. Y. Logunov
Russian Federation
Denis Y. Logunov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
A. L. Gintsburg
Russian Federation
Alexander L. Gintsburg, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Prof., Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
18 Gamaleya St., Moscow 123098
References
1. Fleck-Derderian S, Shankar M, Rao AK, Chatham-Stephens K, Adjei S, Sobel J, et al. The epidemiology of foodborne botulism outbreaks: A systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(1):S73–S81. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix846
2. Black RE, Gunn RA. Hypersensitivity reactions associated with botulinal antitoxin. Am J Med. 1980;69(4):567–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(80)90469-6
3. Anniballi F, Lonati D, Fiore A, Auricchio B, De Medici D, Locatelli CA. New targets in the search for preventive and therapeutic agents for botulism. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014;12(9):1075–86. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2014.945917
4. Rossetto O, Pirazzini M, Lista F, Montecucco C. The role of the single interchains disulfide bond in tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins and the development of antitetanus and antibotulism drugs. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21(11):e13037. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.13037
5. Shcheblyakov D, Esmagambetov I, Simakin P, Kostina L, Kozlov A, Tsibezov V. Development and characterization of two GP-specific monoclonal antibodies, which synergistically protect non-human primates against Ebola lethal infection. Antiviral Res. 2019;172:104617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.104617
6. Muyldermans S, Cambillau C, Wyns L. Recognition of antigens by single-domain antibody fragments: The superfluous luxury of paired domains. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001;26(4):230–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0004(01)01790-x
7. Esmagambetov IB, Shcheblyakov DV, Egorova DA, Voronina OL, Derkaev AA, Voronina DV, et al. Nanobodies are potential therapeutic agents for the Ebola virus infection. Acta Naturae. 2021;13(4):53–63 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32607/actanaturae.11487
8. Kontermann RE. Strategies to extend plasma half-lives of recombinant antibodies. BioDrugs. 2009;23(2):93–109. https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200923020-00003
9. Danquah W, Danquah W, Meyer-Schwesinger C, Rissiek B, Pinto C, Serracant-Prat A, Amadi M, et al. Nanobodies that block gating of the P2X7 ion channel ameliorate inflammation. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(366):366ra162. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8463
10. Godakova SA, Noskov AN, Vinogradova ID, Ugriumova GA, Solovyev AI, Esmagambetov IB, et al. Camelid VHHs fused to human Fc fragments provide long term protection against botulinum neurotoxin A in mice. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(8):464. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11080464
11. Polyansky DS, Ryabova EI, Derkaev AA, Starkov NS, Kashapova IS, Shcheblyakov DV, Karpov AP, Esmagambetov IB. Development of technology for culturing a cell line producing a single-domain antibody fused with the Fc fragment of human IgG1. Fine Chemical Technologies. 2024;19(3):240–57 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32362/2410-6593-2024-19-3-240-257
12. Mant CT, Chen Y, Yan Z, Popa TV, Kovacs JM, Mills JB, et al. HPLC analysis and purification of peptides. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;386:3–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-430-8_1
13. Keck R, Nayak N, Lerner L, Raju S, Ma S, Schreitmueller T, et al. Characterization of a complex glycoprotein whose variable metabolic clearance in humans is dependent on terminal N-acetylglucosamine content. Biologicals. 2008;36(1):49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2007.05.004
14. Newkirk MM, Novick J, Stevenson MM, Fournier MJ, Apostolakos P. Differential clearance of glycoforms of IgG in normal and autoimmune-prone mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996;106(2):259–64. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-847.x
15. Beck A, Haeuw JF, Wurch T, Goetsch L, Bailly C, Corvaïa N. The next generation of antibody-drug conjugates comes of age. Discov Med. 2010;10(53):329–39.
16. Jiang XR, Song A, Bergelson S, Arroll T, Parekh B, May K, et al. Advances in the assessment and control of the effector functions of therapeutic antibodies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(2):101–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3365
17. Reichert JM. Antibody-based therapeutics to watch in 2011. MAbs. 2011;3(1):76–99. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.3.1.13895
18. Rossetto O, Montecucco C. Tables of toxicity of botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(12):686. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11120686
Supplementary files
![]() |
1. Fig. 1. Electropherogram of B11-Fc single-domain antibody samples after the chromatographic purification step using ceramic hydroxyapatite type media. Samples for electrophoresis were prepared under reducing (2–6) and non-reducing (8–12) conditions. Lanes on the electropherogram: 1 and 7, molecular weight marker; 2 and 8, aggregate fraction; 3 and 9, target fraction; 4 and 10, start of target fraction collection; 5 and 11, unbound protein sample; 6 and 12, fraction before purification. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(775KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
![]() |
2. Fig. 4. Survival time course for mice after intraperitoneal (A) and intragastric (B) administration of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A). The dotted lines indicate the time of onset of moderate symptoms. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Other | |
Download
(403KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
![]() |
3. Table 2. Glycan content of the B11-Fc single-domain antibody preparation | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(705KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Derkaev A.A., Ryabova E.I., Esmagambetov I.B., Shcheblyakov D.V., Noskov A.N., Vinogradova I.D., Prokofiev V.V., Polyansky D.S., Logunov D.Y., Gintsburg A.L. A modified single-domain antibody candidate for the treatment of botulism caused by botulinum toxin type A. Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2025;25(1):58-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2025-591