Studying the pharmacokinetics of biotechnological medicinal products on the example of monoclonal antibodies
https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2023-23-2-173-180
Abstract
Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which are developed to treat many pathologies, including cancer, autoimmune and infectious diseases, are one of the fastest growing classes of medicinal products. Given the large number of mAbs in the pipeline and continued interest from pharmaceutical companies, the mAb market is expected to continue to grow in the coming years. To maximise both the therapeutic benefit and the safety of medicinal products in this class, it is essential that their pharmacological properties be carefully characterised and understood.
The aim of the study was to analyse literature data on approaches to studying the pharmacokinetics of mAbs. This review presents data on the main physicochemical and pharmacological properties of mAbs and compares them with small molecules. The article describes the influence of various factors on mAb pharmacokinetics.
For example, such factors include the method of administration, hydrophilicity, and charge of the mAb, individual characteristics of the patient (body weight, plasma albumin levels, genetic characteristics, etc.), and concurrent administration of other medicinal products. The authors evaluated the role of intra- and inter-individual variability of pharmacokinetic parameters. The rapid development of this group of medicinal products and the emergence of new promising molecules are indicative of the need to study the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mAbs in detail and to maximise both the therapeutic benefit and the safety of the medicinal products in this class.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. V. SmirnovRussian Federation
Valery V. Smirnov, Dr. Sci. (Pharm.), Associate Professor
24 Kashirskoe Hwy, Moscow 115522;
8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991
O. A. Petukhova
Russian Federation
Olga A. Petukhova
24 Kashirskoe Hwy, Moscow 115522
A. V. Filatov
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Filatov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor
24 Kashirskoe Hwy, Moscow 115522
D. A. Kudlay
Russian Federation
Dmitry A. Kudlay, Dr. Sci. (Med.)
24 Kashirskoe Hwy, Moscow 115522;
8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991
M. R. Khaitov
Russian Federation
Musa R. Khaitov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corr. Member of RAS
24 Kashirskoe Hwy, Moscow 115522
References
1. Kenakin TP. A Pharmacology Primer: Theory, Applications, and Methods. 2nd ed. Vol. XVIII. Burlington, MA; London: Academic Press; 2006.
2. Leader B, Baca QJ, Golan DE. Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classifi cation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2399
3. Ryman JT, Meibohm B. Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(9):576–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12224
4. Breedveld FC. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Lancet. 2000;355(9205):735–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)01034-5
5. Weiner LM, Surana R, Wang S. Monoclonal antibodies: versatile platforms for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(5):317–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2744
6. Geng X, Kong X, Hu H, Chen J, Yang F, Liang H, et al. Research and development of therapeutic mAbs: an analysis based on pipeline projects. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(12):2769–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1074362
7. Kinder M, Greenplate AR, Strohl WR, Jordan RE, Brezski RJ. An Fc engineering approach that modulates antibody-dependent cytokine release without altering cell-killing functions. MAbs. 2015;7(3):494–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.1022692
8. An Z, Forrest G, Moore R, Cukan M, Haytko P, Huang L, et al. IgG2m4, an engineered antibody isotype with reduced Fc function. MAbs. 2009;1(6):572–9. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.1.6.10185
9. Strohl WR. Current progress in innovative engineered antibodies. Protein Cell. 2018;9(1):86–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0457-8
10. Castelli MS, McGonigle P, Hornby PJ. The pharmacology and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2019;7(6):e00535. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.535
11. Pardridge WM. Blood-brain barrier drug delivery of IgG fusion proteins with a transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015;12(2):207–22. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.952627
12. Cooper PR, Ciambrone GJ, Kliwinski CM, Maze E, Johnson L, Li Q, et al. Effl ux of monoclonal antibodies from rat brain by neonatal Fc receptor, FcRn. Brain Res. 2013;1534:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.035
13. Karaoglu Hanzatian D, Schwartz A, Gizatullin F, Erickson J, Deng K, Villanueva R, et al. Brain uptake of multivalent and multi-specifi c DVD-Ig proteins after systemic administration. MAbs. 2018;10(5):765–77. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F19420862.2018.1465159
14. Wang W, Soriano B, Chen Q. Glycan profi ling of proteins using lectin binding by surface plasmon resonance. Anal Biochem. 2017;538:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2017.09.014
15. Hinke SA, Cieniewicz AM, Kirchner T, D’Aquino K, Nanjunda R, Aligo J, et al. Unique pharmacology of a novel allosteric agonist/sensitizer insulin receptor monoclonal antibody. Mol Metab. 2018;10:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2018.01.014
16. Kang JC, Poovassery JS, Bansal P, You S, Manjarres IM, Ober RJ, Ward ES. Engineering multivalent antibodies to target heregulin-induced HER3 signaling in breast cancer cells. MAbs. 2014;6(2):340–53. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.27658
17. Ovacik M, Lin K. Tutorial on monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and its considerations in early development. Clin Transl Sci. 2018;11(6):540–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12567
18. Köhler G, Milstein C. Derivation of specifi c antibody-producing tissue culture and tumor lines by cell fusion. Eur J Immunol. 1976;6(7):511–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830060713
19. Levene AP, Singh G, Palmieri C. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in oncology. J R Soc Med. 2005;98(4):146–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680509800403
20. Yamashita M, Katakura Y, Shirahata S. Recent advances in the generation of human monoclonal antibody. Cytotechnology. 2007;55(2–3):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-007-9072-5
21. Sedykh SE, Prinz VV, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. Bispecific antibodies: design, therapy, perspectives. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:195–208. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S151282
22. Sau S, Alsaab HO, Kashaw SK, Tatiparti K, Iyer AK. Advances in antibody–drug conjugates: a new era of targeted cancer therapy. Drug Discov Today. 2017;22(10):1547–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.011
23. Keizer RJ, Huitema AD, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(8):493–507. https://doi.org/10.2165/11531280-000000000-00000
24. Roopenian DC, Akilesh S. FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(9):715–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2155
25. Suzuki T, Ishii-Watabe A, Tada M, Kobayashi T, Kanayusu-Toyoda T, Kawanishi T, Yamaguchi T. Importance of neonatal FcR in regulating the serum half-life of therapeutic proteins containing the Fc domain of human IgG1: a comparative study of the affi nity of monoclonal antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins to human neonatal FcR. J Immunol. 2010;184(4):1968–76. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903296
26. Dirks NL, Meibohm B. Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(10):633–59. https://doi.org/10.2165/11535960-000000000-00000
27. Kelly RL, Yu Y, Sun T, Caffry I, Lynaugh H, Brown M, et al. Target-independent variable region mediated effects on antibody clearance can be FcRn independent. MAbs. 2016;8(7):1269–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2016.1208330
28. Datta-Mannan A, Lu J, Witcher DR, Leung D, Tang Y, Wroblewski VJ. The interplay of non-specifi c binding, target-mediated clearance and FcRn interactions on the pharmacokinetics of humanized antibodies. MAbs. 2015;7(6):1084–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.1075109
29. Chiu HH, Tsai IL, Lu YS, Lin CH, Kuo CH. Development of an LC-MS/MS method with protein G purifi cation strategy for quantifying bevacizumab in human plasma. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(28):6583–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0607-0
30. Irie K, Okada A, Yamasaki Y, Kokan C, Hata A, Kaji R, et al. An LC-MS/MS method for absolute quantification of nivolumab in human plasma: application to clinical therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 2018;40(6):716–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000558
31. Chiu HH, Liao HW, Shao YY, Lu YS, Lin CH, Tsai IL, et al. Development of a general method for quantifying IgG-based therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in human plasma using protein G purifi cation coupled with a two internal standard calibration strategy using LC-MS/MS. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1019:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.040
32. Willeman T, Jourdil JF, Gautier-Veyret E, Bonaz B, Stanke-Labesque F. A multiplex liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantifi cation of seven therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: application for adalimumab therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with Crohn’s disease. Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1067:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.03.033
33. Iwamoto N, Takanashi M, Shimada T, Sasaki J, Hamada A. Comparison of bevacizumab quantifi cation results in plasma of non-small cell lung cancer patients using bioanalytical techniques between LC-MS/MS, ELISA, and microfl uidic-based immunoassay. AAPS J. 2019;21(6):101. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0369-z
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Smirnov V.V., Petukhova O.A., Filatov A.V., Kudlay D.A., Khaitov M.R. Studying the pharmacokinetics of biotechnological medicinal products on the example of monoclonal antibodies. Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2023;23(2):173-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2023-23-2-173-180