Development and certification of reference standards for phenolic content in biologicals, based on comparison of results obtained by GLC, HPLC, spectrophotometric, and colorimetric methods
https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2021-21-3-193-199
Abstract
Phenol is used as a preservative in a number of biological products. Methods that are used for quantitative determination of phenol differ a lot. Current requirements for accredited laboratories include continuous internal quality control. Reference standards with a certified content of the analyte are an effective metrological tool for ensuring such control. The aim of the study was to develop and certify reference standards for phenolic content in biological products, based on comparison of results obtained by GLC, HPLC, spectrophotometric, and colorimetric methods. Materials and methods: diluent for allergens by (candidate reference standard), 2.5 and 5 mg/mL phenol solutions, and 2.5 mg/mL 2-phenoxyethanol solution were used in the study. The experiments were performed using spectrophotometric, colorimetric, HPLC, and GLC procedures. The statistical analysis of results included calculation of the arithmetic mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and analysis of variance with Student’s t-test and Fisher’s F-test. Results: the results of phenolic content determination by the spectrophotometric, colorimetric, and HPLC methods were statistically comparable. The F value obtained for equal sample sizes (n = 40) was F = 0.9343, given the critical value Fcrit = 3.96. A reference standard certified by one of these methods can be used to control the consistency of phenol determination by a relevant method. The results of phenolic content determination by the GLC method showed statistically significantly differences: F = 17.47, given Fcrit = 3.96, which demonstrated the need for certification of another reference standard. Conclusions: two reference standards were certified in the study: reference standard 42-28-449 with the certified phenolic content of 2.56‒3.32 mg/mL, to be used with the spectrophotometric, colorimetric, and HPLC methods; and reference standard 42-28-451 with the certified phenolic content of 2.92‒3.28 mg/mL, to be used with the GLC method.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. N. KolesnikovaRussian Federation
Oksana N. Kolesnikova
8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051
O. V. Fadeikina
Russian Federation
Olga V. Fadeikina, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051
O. B. Ustinnikova
Russian Federation
Olga B. Ustinnikova, Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051
R. A. Volkova
Russian Federation
Rauza A. Volkova, Dr. Sci. (Biol.)
8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051
A. A. Movsesyants
Russian Federation
Artashes A. Movsesyants, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051
References
1. Kolesnikova ON, Runova OB, Ustinnikova OB. Development and validation of gas-liquid chromatography method for quantitative determination of phenol in biological medicinal products. Khimiko-farmatsevticheskiy zhurnal = Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal. 2018;52(5):60–4 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30906/0023-1134-2018-52-5-60-64
2. Kolesnikova ON, Ustinnikova OB, Runova OB. Method for quantitative determination of phenol in biological medicinal preparations by gas-liquid chromatography. Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2693518; 2019 (In Russ.)
3. Dettmer-Wilde K, Engewald W. Practical Gas Chromatography: a Comprehensive Reference. Berlin: Springer, 2014.
4. Berezkin VG, Chemical Methods in Gas Chromatography. Journal of Chromatography Library. V. 24. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishers; 1983.
5. Parris NA. Instrumental Liquid Chromatography. Journal of Chromatography Library. V. 27. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1984.
6. Hyver К, ed. High resolution liquid chromatography. Hewlett-Packard Со.; 1989 (In Russ.)
7. Bruner F. The Science of Chromatography. Journal of Chromatography Library. V. 32. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier, 1985.
8. Guiochon G, Guillemin CL. Quantitative Gas Chromatography for Laboratory Analyses and On-line Process Control. Journal of Chromatography Library. V. 42. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier; 1988.
9. Rotzsche H. Stationary Phases in Gas Chromatography. Journal of Chromatography Library. V. 48. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier; 1991.
10. Hanai T. Liquid Chromatography in Biomedical Analysis. Journal of Chromatography Library. V. 50. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier; 1991.
11. Glantz SA. Primer of biostatistics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1994
12. Bondarev VP, Borisevich IV, Volkova RA, Fadeikina OV. Industry reference standards certification for the control of medical immunobiological preparations. Vedomosty Nauchnogo tsentra ekspertizy sredstv medicinscogo primeneniya = The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2013;(2):28–32 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2013-0-2
13. Fadeikina OV, Volkova RA. Elaboration of the certification procedure for biological reference standards. Khimiko-farmatsevticheskii zhurnal = Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal. 2017;51(8):44–50 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30906/0023-1134-2017-51-8-44-50
14. Volkova RA. Problems metrological support of quality assessment methods of immunobiological drugs. In international conference “Reference materials and measurement technology”. Proceedings. Part 1. Ekaterinburg; 2013. P. 88–90 (In Russ.)
15. Volkova RA. Methods of control or testing procedures — the issue of metrological support of analytical methods. Spravochnik zaveduyuschego KDL. 2013;(4):4–9 (In Russ.)
16. Merkulov VA, Sakanyan EI, Klimov VI, Shemeryankina TB, Yashkir VA, Barmin AV. Modern approaches to development of reference substances for evaluation of the quality of pharmaceuticals. Khimiko-farmatsevticheskii zhurnal = Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal. 2015;49(11):54–6 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30906/0023-1134-2015-49-11-54-56
Review
For citations:
Kolesnikova O.N., Fadeikina O.V., Ustinnikova O.B., Volkova R.A., Movsesyants A.A. Development and certification of reference standards for phenolic content in biologicals, based on comparison of results obtained by GLC, HPLC, spectrophotometric, and colorimetric methods. BIOpreparations. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2021;21(3):193-199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2021-21-3-193-199