Preview

Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment

Advanced search

Analysis of Promising Approaches to COVID-19 Vaccine Development

https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2020-20-4-216-227

Abstract

The number of confirmed COVID-19 cases worldwide amounted to 50 million at the beginning of November 2020. This is clearly not enough for the formation of herd immunity, which will prevent repeated outbreaks of the disease. Quarantine measures can only curb the spread of the disease to some extent, therefore specific preventive measures are needed to create collective immunity to COVID-19.The underlying principle of collective immunity is indirect protection of the whole of the population by immunising a certain part of it. Vaccination is the most effective approach to prevention of epidemic outbreaks. The aim of the study was to analyse promising approaches to the development of vaccines against novel coronavirus COVID-19 infection. The paper summarises data on development studies and clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines conducted in different countries. It analyses the pros and cons of different platforms for vaccine development (attenuated vaccines, inactivated vaccines, subunit vaccines, DNA and RNA vaccines, recombinant vector vaccines). The paper presents a potential design of novel vaccines. It was concluded that COVID-19 vaccines might be developed both for immunising high-risk groups and for mass immunisation. An optimal solution for the second task would be to develop human or monkey adenovirus vector-based vaccines whose mass production has already been unveiled.

About the Authors

G. G. Onishchenko
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Gennadiy G. Onishchenko, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of RAS.,

8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991



T. E. Sizikova
48 Central Scientific Research Institute
Russian Federation

Tatyana E. Sizikova, Cand. Sci. (Biol.).,

11 Oktyabr'skaya St., Sergiev Posad-6, Moscow Oblast 141306



V. N. Lebedev
48 Central Scientific Research Institute
Russian Federation

Vitaliy N. Lebedev, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor.

11 Oktyabr'skaya St., Sergiev Posad-6, Moscow Oblast 141306, Russian Federation



S. V. Borisevich
48 Central Scientific Research Institute
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Borisevich, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Corr. Member of RAS.,

11 Oktyabr'skaya St., Sergiev Posad-6, Moscow Oblast 141306



References

1. Hui DS, Azhar EI, Madani TA, Ntoumi F, Kock R, Dar O, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health — The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;91:264–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009

2. Lvov DK, Alkhovsky SV, Kolobukhina LV, Burtseva EI. Etiology of epidemic outbreaks COVID-19 in Wuhan, Hubei province, Chinese People Republic associated with 2019-nCoV (Nidovirales, Coronaviridae, Coronavirinae, Betacoronavirus, Subgenus Sarbecovirus): lessons of SARS-CoV outbreak. Voprosy virusologii = Problems of Virology, Russian Journal. 2020;65(1):6–15 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36233/0507-4088-2020-65-1-6-15

3. Fine P, Eames K, Heymann DL. «Herd immunity»: a rough guide. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(7):911–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir007

4. Holme P, Masuda N. The basic reproductive number as a predictor for epidemic outbreaks in temporal networks. Plos ONE. 2015;10(3):e0120567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120567

5. Thanh Le T, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A, Gómez Román R, Tollefsen S, Saville M, Mayhew S. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020:19(5):305–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020- 00073-5

6. Feldmann H, Jones S, Klenk HD, Schnittler HJ. Ebola virus: from discovery to vaccine. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(8):677– 85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1154

7. Decaro N, Lorusso A. Novel human coronavirus (SARSCoV-2): A lesson from animal coronaviruses. Vet Microbiol. 2020;244:108693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108693

8. Yip MS, Leung NH, Cheung CY, Li PH, Lee HH, Daëron M, et al. Antibody-dependent infection of human macrophages by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Virol J. 2014;11:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-11-82

9. Jaume M, Yip MS, Cheung CY, Leung HL, Li PH, Kien F, et al. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike antibodies trigger infection of human immune cells via a pH- and cysteine protease-independent FcγR pathway. J Virol. 2011;85(20):10582–97. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00671-11

10. Cai Y, Zhang J, Xiao T, Peng H, Sterling SM, Walsh RM Jr, et al. Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science. 2020;369(6511):1586–92. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd4251

11. Sohag AAM, Hannan MA, Rahman S, Hossain M, Hasan M, Khan MK, et al. Revisiting potential druggable targets against SARS-CoV-2 and repurposing therapeutics under preclinical study and clinical trials: a comprehensive review. Drug Dev Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21709

12. Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV, Zubcova OV, Tukhvatullin AI, Shcheblyakov DV, Dzharullaeva AS, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two formulations two open non-randomized phase 1/2 studies from Russia. Lancet. 2020;396(10255):887–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31866-3

13. Zhu FC, Guan XH, Li YH, Huang JY, Jiang T, Hou LH, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10249):479–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31605-6

14. Yan-Jun Zhang, Gang Zeng, Hong-Xing Pan, Chang-Gui Li, Biao Kan, Ya-Ling Hu, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: report of the randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.31.20161216

15. Xia S, Duan K, Zhang Y, Zhao D, Zhang H, Xie Z, et al. Effect of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 on safety and immunogenicity outcomes: interim analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2020;324(10):951–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.15543

16. Zhu FC, Guan XH, Li YH, Huang JY, Jiang T, Hou LH, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10249):479–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31605-6

17. Jackson LA, Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Roberts PC, Makhene M, Coler RN, et al. An mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020;NEJMoa2022483. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483

18. Mulligan MJ, Lyke KE, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Phase 1/2 study to describe the safety and immunogenicity of a COVID-19 RNA vaccine candidate (BNT162b1) in adults 18 to 55 years of age: interim report. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.30.20142570


Review

For citations:


Onishchenko G.G., Sizikova T.E., Lebedev V.N., Borisevich S.V. Analysis of Promising Approaches to COVID-19 Vaccine Development. BIOpreparations. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2020;20(4):216-227. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2020-20-4-216-227

Views: 1967


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-996X (Print)
ISSN 2619-1156 (Online)